• It’s time for Nevada to stop criminalizing acts between consenting same sex couples

    Senate Bill 388 eliminates the “infamous crimes against nature” law. It passed out of both houses and now heads to the desk of Governor Brian Sandoval

    PLEASE CALL 775-684-5670 OR EMAIL the Governor today: http://gov.nv.gov/contact/


    Nevada’s outdated “infamous crimes against nature” statute discriminates against same sex couples and violates their rights to equal protection under the law.

    Under current Nevada law, the age of consent is different for same sex and opposite sex couples. While the age of consent for opposite sex couples is 16, same sex couples effectively cannot consent to sex, or even communicate about sex, until age 18, due to the “infamous crimes  against nature” statute. Same sex couples can also be criminalized for their behavior, because this statute is law, Nevadans are being charged with this alleged crime.


    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nevada has sued the state Nevada for prosecuting a gay teen who had consensual sex with his partner.


    SB388 does not eliminate ANY of the crimes currently on our books that protect children because other statutes protect against sexual contact between adults and children. Not only is the “infamous crimes” statute outdated and discriminatory, but also it has no real legal necessity, given that there are already crimes on the books under which individuals can be charged.



  • After 150 years, what changed?

    Our state director Bob Fulkerson on how SJR15 came to be.

    Screen Shot 2013-05-24 at 10.35.34 AM

    SJR15 candies PLAN gave to legislators on Valentine’s Day

    We at PLAN have been asked several times about what changed between 2010 and now that turned the tide against mining’s stranglehold on Nevada. Here’s some thoughts:

    In 2009, PLAN tried to get some measly deductions removed from the industry but we were shut down handily. In 2010, we launched the Nevada Fair Mining Tax initiative that would have changed the constitutional cap from 5% net to 5% gross. But mining mounted a vigorous legal challenge, and ran out the clock before we could get enough signatures.

    Meanwhile, the state is in the midst of a devastating recession, cutting $1 billion from education alone over a 5-year period. People saw mining and the rurals doing incredibly well. They wondered why the Legislature wouldn’t enact a tax higher than the 1 percent mining tax it paid to the general fund. And the answer was because mining was protected in the Nevada constitution. This concerned people in Clark County, who knew that whether the Strip boomed or lost money, schools in Elko and other mining towns would be funded by their dollars. Yet when mining did well (this year, mineral production exceeded $10 billion in Nevada), Clark County didn’t see many mining dollars at all.

    In the 2011 session, Senate Revenue Chair Sheila Leslie  and Majority Leader Steven Horsford held hearings on mining taxation. What came to light was the laundry list of deductions, coupled with the fact that the mining companies had rarely, if ever, been audited by the state. The fall guy was the head of Nevada’s Department of Taxation, who had to resign. The mining lobbyists had gamed the Tax Commission (the lobbyist for Newmont was a former member) by writing in deductions on everything from the dues to the World Gold Council to double dipping health care costs. It took the press and other legislators aback, and mining’s been on its heels ever since.

    Finally, mining’s reaction to heightened scrutiny has been arrogant and ill conceived-which never makes you any friends. In 2011, they were neutral on SJR 15. In hearings on the Senate side this year, they were still testifying as neutral. (Although everyone knew this was BS.) But at the hearings in the Assembly, they came with both barrels blazing, threatening lawsuits and reduced funding for the budget. Hubris once again.

    People began seeing that mining had run Nevada like a colony since statehood, and became outraged. To show how far the tide had turned, even conservative Republicans who voted against SJR 15 in 2011 launched their own effort in 2013 to tax mining by another $600 million-contingent on passage of SJR 15.

    It’s no wonder mining offered a $50 million bribe to the Nevada Legislature to kill SJR 15, in the most outrageous and under-reported story of the session.
    We’re encouraged by the strength Legislative leaders have demonstrated under such immense pressure from mining. Next step is to pass this on the November 2014 ballot, then to enact a reasonable severance tax on mineral production to build infrastructure that will last long after the mines are gone.


  • Drag for DREAMs – Scholarship Application!

    On Thursday, May 16th the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada’s Uniting Communities program and the Gay and Lesbian Center of Southern Nevada hosted Drag for DREAMs, a drag show fundraiser for undocumented students in Nevada.
    Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a program announced by President Obama last June. It allows undocumented students (known as DREAMers) to obtain a work permit and gives them reprieve from deportation.
    The cost of one DACA application is $465. We will be awarding two DACA scholarships to two lucky Nevada DREAMers!

    Complete this form to apply for a scholarship that will go towards your Deferred Action (DACA) application.
    Deadline to apply is Wednesday, June 5th 2013. Winners will be announced Tuesday, June 11th 2013.


  • Happy Mother’s Day, for all the mamas

    Astrid Silva, co-founder of DREAM Big Vegas, is an activist in Southern Nevada. She wrote this blog to share the undocumented perspective on Mother’s Day:

    Ever since I was young I remember dreading ‘El Dia de las Madres’ – in Mexico, Mother’s Day is celebrated on the 10th of May every year no matter what the day falls on as opposed to the second Sunday as it is here. I could never pin point why I didn’t like the holiday or why I didn’t look forward to it, it wasn’t the having to buy two presents for my mom or that I didn’t love her in abundance.

    When I look back and think of my memories of ‘El Dia de las Madres’ they are filled with seeing my mom crying and playing songs for my Abuelita Chabela over the phone. They are memories of my Dad calling his siblings to make sure they received the money he had gathered to be able to send to my Abuelita Mica, then having to hope they would do what he specified with it. Sometimes we would call and get to talk to the Abuelas’ briefly because they were being whisked away to some celebration in their honor, with all the laughter of their grandchildren in the background. Meanwhile we were left with the empty feeling that I couldn’t describe until now.

    Screen Shot 2013-05-10 at 2.18.38 PM

    Las Vegas DREAMers pose with their mothers before heading off to Immigrant Lobby Day in Carson City.

    I know that my only surviving grandparent, my Abuelita Chabela is 76 years old and that inevitably those calls will all together cease. This morning when my mom said, “I’m calling your Abuelita” I cringed. Every year it gets harder and harder to talk to her on the phone. I’ve been able to wiggle my way out to only talking to her on the major holidays and even then I find and excuse to end the conversation early. It isn’t that I don’t love the woman who gave my mother life, I don’t want to grow attached to someone I will likely never meet. Is it selfish – Yes. I have no excuse and I hurt my mom every time I turn down her excited pleads to talk to her Mama. I know that one day sooner than later there will be the call that I have already lived through 3 times, 3 painful earth shattering times. I know what it feels like to have the air sucked out of me and not know what to do.

    What makes my grandparents dying different than maybe yours? My parents left everything they knew, including their parents for MY future.  Their want and need to give me a better life and to give me the things that they knew would never be possible for me in Mexico. They never once hesitated to give me the ability to achieve all of my dreams. Their love for me made them leave their parents behind not knowing if they would ever see them again, which ultimately came true. My parents were a few years older than I am now when they left their homes, they haven’t returned more than 20 years later. I now realize that growing up the feeling of guilt became overwhelming, my young mind couldn’t comprehend what those feelings were.

    As an organizer I get to meet dozens of families that are in the exact same situation, my family is not the only one going through this. Our broken immigration system has trapped people here unable to comfort their sick mothers in foreign countries, unable to see their children walk at their graduations or give them medicine when they have a fever. The time is now, I can’t spend another ‘Dia de las Madres’ with my Abuelita on the phone.


    Astrid Silva

    DREAM Big Vegas



  • PLAN’s legislative priorities update

    During our legislative retreat earlier this year PLAN’s staff, executive board, and member group organizations chose five legislative priorities to focus on. With less than a month left in the session, we wanted to give you an update on how these bills are doing.

    Be sure to contact your Assembly and Senate representatives and ask them to support these pieces of legislation that will help create a more fair and just Nevada.

    Screen Shot 2013-05-07 at 7.56.50 PM

    PLAN team members Bob, Stacey and Rosa hard at work during a recently hearing in Carson City


    Senate Joint Resolution 15 Removal of Mining Tax Protections
    Current Status: Passed the Senate 17-4. Assembly Taxation heard the bill on Monday, no action was taken. Click here to contact members of the committee and ask for a vote.


    Senate Joint Resolution 13 Marriage Equality
    Current Status: Passed the Senate 12-9. Assembly Legislative Operations committee hearing Thursday May 9th at 4:00pm. Contact your member of the Assembly!


    Senate Bill 321 Homeowner Bill of Rights
    Current Status: Passed the Senate 21-0. Heard before the Assembly Judiciary Committee, no action taken.  Contact your member of the Assembly


    Senate Bill 303 Driver Authorization Cards
    Current Status: Stalled in the Senate. Senate Committee on Finance hearing Wednesday May 8th time to be determined. Contact your member of the Senate!


    Assembly Bill 230 Comprehensive Sex Education
    Current Status: Passed the Assembly 26-15. Heard in Senate Education committee Monday May 6th; no action taken. Contact your member of the Senate!




    Thank you for all of your support this session. We’re looking forward to finishing this session strong!


    If you have questions or concerns, please contact our Lobbyist Stacey Shinn sshinn@planevada.org or our Racial Equity Report Card lead Michael Ginsburg mginsburg@planevada.org


    Of course, PLAN will lobby for and organize around dozens of pieces of legislation that will help to create a more fair and just Nevada.



    Communications Director



  • Breaking Down Barriers, Building Up Communities

    This past weekend I took some time off to volunteer as a Co-Director for Camp Anytown. This camp’s curriculum was founded in 1957 and designed to educate, liberate, and empower high school aged participants, with a focus on diversity and leadership for social justice. Anytown’s motto is “Breaking Down Barriers, Building Up Communities,” which highlights the fact that a lot of the work done at camp is focused on not just tolerating, but respecting and celebrating each other’s differences and unify around our commonalities as members of the human race.



    So many things draw me back to camp. One of the big factors is the staff. It was at Anytown that I had the pleasure of getting to know the late and great Shannon West, who really helped Clark County step up the quality and coordination of its homeless services. It was at camp that I met now-Assemblyman Tyrone Thompson. I’ve gotten to know and become close to a variety of community leaders, from the folks who are out on the front lines every day working jobs that address society’s problems, to the volunteers for whom this is their main or only cause, to the social work students putting their lessons into action, and of course the former delegates who are coming to give back to a camp that changed their life. Our head medic is also our head chef, and not only does he make delicious food, he inspires me by always coming up to camp, buying food, and keeping everyone healthy, all for free. Oh, and in between camps he’s a paramedic for the Fire Department!


    But what really amazes me are the student delegates. Some are starting organizations and running projects at 14. Others were in jail at 16 and are working to turn their lives around; still others are homeless. Some are separated from their families through our broken immigration system. In all, these delegates not only represent their schools and their generation, they also represent the ways that we as adults and we as a society are failing them. But on the positive side, they are all stories on the resilience of the human spirit and the possibilities and promise that this generation holds.  Over 3 days, most of these delegates really start to challenge their stereotypes and prejudices based on race, ethnicity, and gender. They connect with people they’d never talk to otherwise, and go outside of their comfort zones. They reflect upon and cherish this experience for the rest of their lives! Young people are not apathetic, they are smart, they are passionate, and they need our support. The problems we see with youth are just reflections of our own shortcomings, and it’s something we can fix by taking a little time to serve as mentors and having deeper, more open conversations with each other.


    I wish more people supported this program so it could reach even more Nevadans, but for now I’ll give what I can and wait for the next camp to come.



    Howard Watts III

    Field Director

    Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada


  • Will ‘Stop and Swab’ Replace Stop and Frisk?’ DNA Profiling and Race

    Today is national DNA Day. It marks the day on which James Watson and Francis Crick along with Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin published their papers elucidating the structure of human DNA. 10 years ago today also marks the day that scientists working on the Human Genome Project announced that their efforts were nearly complete. That same day the U.S. Congress issued a proclamation declaring April 25th National DNA Day.  Having studied and worked in the field of genetics for two decades, this day has always passed with a sense of geeky pride for me. Pride in the work that I was a part of and pride in the fact that for one day many in the nation would share in the wonderment and potential of the human genome and experience what I felt almost every day. Nothing has changed for me in the excitement I feel or in my belief that research into our DNA will bring about great capacity to alleviate suffering, shatter long-held misconceptions about race and class, and help people live to their fullest potential. However, this year I cannot help but feel the technology I have always held in such high regard has been hijacked.

    You see, a person’s DNA reveals a lot about them. This is mostly information concerning discontinuous traits like your blood type or clearly-defined diseases like hemophilia or sickle-cell anemia. Your DNA can also provide information on your likelihood of developing other diseases such as cancers or diabetes. Medical genetics may soon give precise odds that a person will develop any given disease, provide information about continuous traits such as height, and will likely provide us with all the information necessary to plan out our health care needs, dietary requirements, and exercise regimes for our entire lives. Of course, our DNA will not reveal quite everything about us.  It will not reveal as socio-economic status or race. Sure, DNA may provide someone with an intellectual advantage to boost earning potential or specify how and to what extent differing pigments are carried, but this is actually quite a subtle and continuous trait. There is also research which now demonstrates genetic markers for propensity towards anger or having a predisposition to violence. Scientists carefully warn that this information should not be used to make assumptions about any person since many of us carry these genes or markers; they simply aren’t expressed for some reason. Your DNA may also be able to do one other thing, convince a court or jury of your guilt or innocence.

    It is this last item that is of particular concern to me on this National DNA Day.  Many in law enforcement have been working for more than a decade to expand laws authorizing the collection of samples from individuals taken into custody so that their DNA may be added to a national database and checked against DNA obtained at other crime scenes. After efforts to pass such a law in Nevada was unsuccessful two years ago, the legislature has again taken the issue up for consideration with Senate Bill 243, which passed the Senate last week by a unanimous vote.

    This seems a particularly strange use of government resources, since the use of genetic information as a criminal dragnet goes against everything that one is taught as a scientist. You should never set out to prove yourself right, but always strive to prove yourself wrong. I have always found it strange that we as a society are willing to spend so much on law enforcement and the penal system and so little on education, research, and health care. As citizens, we should be demanding that our government focus its attention and use this technology to cure diseases and understand some of the factors which cause people to become prone to acts of violence. Instead, our government is allowing the FBI, not scientists, to push states to enact punishment-based laws while eroding civil rights and liberties in the process. The United States now has a national DNA indexing system known as CODIS [Combined DNA Index System]. It is run by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and provides, among other things, support for the expansion of model legislation for arrestee DNA collection.

    Understandably, those in law enforcement want to be able to solve and prevent as many crimes as possible. And while most would agree that law enforcement should have the best tools available, I think people would rank the preservation of individual rights and liberties as an even higher priority. While many people question the use of the technology at all, others simply question the practice of collecting specimens from individuals prior to conviction and would be willing to overlook other issues if this additional precaution were taken. I myself have a number of concerns with the use of DNA profiling, ranging from the technological to the legal.  While some of my concerns could be lessened with changes to the bill, such as post-conviction sample collection and better regulations of the chain of custody and DNA lab, my concerns with racial equity and Constitutional rights cannot. There also seems to be unwillingness on the part of legislators sponsoring these types of bills to make any significant changes. The lack of compromise on the matter is puzzling. It was not until reading the Department of Justice report on the effectiveness of DNA profiling along with realizing that the FBI was pushing this model legislation did the unwillingness for change make sense.

    Several reports over the last decade are revealing in what they conclude; they are also revealing in what they omit. In all the reports, the top contributing factors leading to a DNA profile match are the quantity and quality of the sample taken from the crime scene for which a match is sought. Several other factors appear on these lists, including techniques, training, and chain of custody. The one thing you will not find in these reports is the efficacy of the sample size database. Don’t bother trying to find such numbers either; the government has refused to release them. Studies in countries that utilizing or have used similar databases show that the size of the database makes little difference to finding a profile match. These studies demonstrate that an extremely high number of DNA profiles would be required in order to be of much use and that law enforcement is better served investigating the crime rather than spending time and resources waiting on some miracle technology to do it for them. In other words, the only way to make the system work is to drastically increase the number of people required to submit a sample for profiling. This explains the unwillingness to drop pre-conviction sampling and also explains why there has even been a push for expansion in other states, which now include such violations as walking a dog in California with the wrong length of leash.

    As of the end of 2012, just over half of the states have enacted arrestee DNA collection laws. Nearly all of these laws are pre-conviction, and I for one do not find it to be a coincidence that 20 of those 28 states are at or below the Missouri Compromise Line. Oklahoma, Georgia, and Nevada are the exceptions. I mention this, because it brings me to my last and most important deal-breaker for these laws.

    If you are reading this blog, then it should also come as no surprise to you that black men are six times more likely to be stopped by police, more than three times as likely to be taken into custody as a result and twice as likely to have some sort of altercation resulting in additional, serious charges. Once introduced or reintroduced to the criminal justice system, people of color are far more likely to be convicted of crimes for which they are charged and more likely to receive a prison sentence. In fact, nearly two-thirds of the U.S. prison population is comprised of people of color and 1 in 10 black males in their thirties will be in jail on any given day. These disparities that exist in our criminal justice system will also be extended to the DNA profile databases, subjecting people of color to disproportionately high rates of what will amount to a form of electronic surveillance without probable cause and without warrant for the rest of their lives. I would hope that after decades of Jim Crow, segregation, the War on Drugs, the school to prison pipeline, and stop and frisk, we wouldn’t want to add additional measures to further exacerbate the this epidemic.

    Perhaps some in society are willing to accept a forfeiture of rights for those convicted of crimes. After all, it isn’t their rights they are willing to forfeit. But are people really willing to forfeit the rights to privacy, due process, and protection against unreasonable search and seizure for everyone?  There should be no debate regarding the violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, allowing defendants to access their own sample for the purposes of exoneration, and the disproportionate effects of racial profiling and the institutional racism of the criminal justice system. We should turn our eyes instead to the system that still struggles to confront and address the institutionalized racism that clouds much of today’s justice.

  • Inocente

    PLAN organizer Christopher Preciado partnered with The Gay and Lesbian Center of Southern Nevada to host a screening of the Academy Award winning documentary ‘Inocente’ and to discuss what its like to be an undocumented youth in Nevada, and what its like when that identity intersects with your queer identity.


    A question every organizer involved in the immigration reform battle has had to ask themselves is: “How are we going to get non-immigrants to care about immigrant related issues?”.

    The Center, serving the LGBTQ community of Southern Nevada, opened up their beautiful new building for a group of youth to screen the documentary ‘Inocente’. This Academy Award winning documentary provides a fresh perspective on the struggles faced by many undocumented youth living in the United States; a perspective that doesn’t focus on the usual political battles, but focuses purely on the life of an undocumented 15 year old named Inocente, who is trying her best to survive as she faces homelessness and deportation. Creating art is what she loves to do, and it keeps her sane in a world that has not been kind to her or her family. Inocente’s art manages to be quirky, beautiful, and emotional all at the same time. It is showcased throughout the film, which you can watch online by clicking here.

    UCNV Inocente Screening-5

    Youth at The Center listening intently as our panel of undocumented youth talk about their lives in Nevada.

    I am the lead organizer for PLAN’s Uniting Communities Nevada program. Uniting Communities is a project of the Western States Center that supports organizations like PLAN working in the racial justice and immigrant rights movements to proactively engage and include their members and constituencies who are LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer) people of color. LGBTQ people of color have been leaders in movements for justice, from Bayard Rustin to Sylvia Rivera. Accepting, embracing and engaging LGBTQ people of color make racial justice groups stronger and represent their entire communities.

    Many of the youth who use the services of The Center are homeless, many are youth of color, some are undocumented, and of course most identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender or Queer, or a term that may be new to some “Undocuqueer”; an undocumented queer person. Undocuqueers often feel like they have to come out twice, once as LGBT or Q and then again as undocumented.

    After the Inocente screening we wanted to have a discussion about the film, but always move the conversation towards all the intersecting identities people of color and LGBTQs may or

    may not have and how that affects us in our daily lives. Our discussion was lead by Blanca, a 23 year old DREAMer from Sonora, Mexico; Rafael, a 24 year old DREAMer from Jalisco, Mexico; and Betzabe a 20 year old DREAMer from Guanajuato, Mexico. DREAMer refers to someone who is eligible for the DREAM Act; a bill that would allow undocumented youth not born in the United States, but brought here as young children, an opportunity to become citizens. All three of our panelists have lived in Southern Nevada for most of their lives.

    Betzabe talked about being an undocqueer, and how she had to come out twice; as undocumented and as a lesbian. She also talked about the racism and sexism she’s had to endure from people unaware of how she identifies, because her appearance, blonde hair and blue yes, she says she’s not your “typical looking Mexican.” Her story resonated with the entire room, the connection of having to “come out” as undocumented is something the entire room has, or for some, still is stru

    ggling with.

    Both Blanca and Rafael are well known DREAM activist who have been fighting not only for passage of the DREAM Act, but also for federal immigration reform so that their parents can remain in the United States. They both work for Hermandad Mexicana, a local non-profit organization that provides immigration services. They help DREAMers like themselves apply for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a program President Obama announced last June that allows DREAMers to obtain a work permit and protects the

    m from deportation for up to two years.

    When asked why she feels American when she has no rights, and why she couldn’t just go back to her birth country, Blanca answered, “America is the only country I know. When I was growing up I pledged allegiance to the flag and have lived my life just like any other American kid. To say that you can just deport me and send me back to my country…that’s just not realistic.”

    Rafael who, like Betzabe identifies as Undocuqueer, provided great detailed background information on where we are currently in the federal immigration battle, as well as explaining in detail what DACA is, and what all members of the community can do to fight for comprehensive immigration reform that keeps families together and is a benefit to all immigrations and undocumented Nevadans.


    Blanca, Rafael and Betzabe

    The youth at The Center peppered the panel with questions. Many began to realize the many parallels between life of undocumented and LGBTQ youth. Eventually someone asked me for the number to their member of Congress. I was not expecting the room to want to become actively involved in the immigration reform battle so soon, but I gladly provided the information and am looking forward to many who attended the screening working with PLAN and our Keeping Families Together campaign for federal immigration reform.

    What was probably most touching out of the whole event was when one of the youth rose his hand and said he stopped saying the pledge of allegiance because there was never something in this country for him to be proud of – until he heard Blanca, Rafael, and Betzabe speak. They made him proud to be an American and he will now start saying the pledge of allegiance again. Outcomes like these keep me motivated to advancing the work that Uniting Communities Nevada provides. In order to accomplish something meaningful we must all work together and join forces – fighting the good fight.

  • Be part of Nevada’s Big Give and donate to PLAN!

    NV Big Give 2013


    Nevada’s Big Give is a flurry of fundraising activity in a 24 hour period to benefit Nevada’s non-profits.

    PLAN currently is among the top 25 of donations received! You can help us stay on top by donating $10 right now by clicking HERE. It takes less than a minute to donate and your generous contribution will go a long way toward supporting PLAN’s social justice organizing to make Nevada a more fair and just place for all Nevadans to live!

    Check out PLAN member groups who are also part of Nevada’s Big Give:

    Committee to Aid Abused Women

    Gay and Lesbian Center of Southern Nevada

    Food Bank of Northern Nevada

    Nevada Conservation League

    Planned Parenthood

    ProgressNow Nevada


  • PLAN’s work highlighted in US Senate

    PLAN organizer Christopher Preciado highlights PLAN’s LGBT work to Senate Democrats in Washington, DC

    Chris and Harry

    Christopher Preciado and US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Washington, DC

    At the invitation of US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, I participated in a roundtable discussion with national LGBT leaders from organizations like the Gay and Lesbian Task Force, HRC, ACLU and Freedom to Marry to talk about the work the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada has done for the LGBTQ community in Nevada before the Senate Democrats Steering and Outreach Committee.

    Chair of the committee, Senator Mark Begich of Alaska, got the discussion started on how we can all work together with Congress to advance LGBT inclusive policy across the country. It was clear that while all states are working hard to reach full equality for all citizens, there is still much work to be done.

    I was able to highlight work I do as organizing lead for Uniting Communities Nevada (UCNV). Uniting Communities is a project of the Western States Center that supports organizations like PLAN working in the racial justice and immigrant rights movements to proactively engage and include their members and constituencies who are LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer) people of color. LGBTQ people of color have been leaders in movements for justice, from Bayard Rustin to Sylvia Rivera. Accepting, embracing and engaging LGBTQ people of color make racial justice groups stronger and represent their entire communities.

    UCNV had its first ever lobby day on Valentine’s Day. More than 20 members from all over the state traveled to Carson City and lobbied legislators on issues like marriage equality, driver authorization cards, comprehensive sex education, and mining tax reform. PLAN knows from past experience that the best way to pass legislation is by building diverse coalitions and lifting up all voices. That was the message that resonated with everyone at our roundtable.

    The steering committee happened to fall on the same day as a historic immigration reform rally, aptly named A10 to coincide with the rally’s date of April 10th. Everyone at the committee roundtable said it is important for their organization to see that comprehensive immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship becomes law this year. It was among the top priorities of almost every group represented, including PLAN.